State v. Brown
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MITCHELL, Justice.
The defendant contends, inter alia, that the trial court erred by admitting into evidence the previous convictions of two others for the same crimes with which he was charged in this case. We agree and hold that the defendant is entitled to a new trial.
The State’s evidence tended to show that on the night of Sunday, 17 June 1984, the victim left her apartment and went to Hardee’s for food. She returned home immediately and parked directly in front of her apartment. Two men approached her and asked if she knew of a “Cashwell” who lived in that apartment. She said she did not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kirby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- State v. WoodsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. KerleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- Paige v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. HarperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010