Cray Inc. v. Raytheon Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION
JAMES L. ROBART, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the court is Defendant Raytheon Company’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff Cray Inc.’s amended complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. (Mot. (Dkt. # 37); see also Am. Compl; (Dkt. #29).) In its amended complaint, Cray alleges that Ray-theon misappropriated Cray’s high performance computing (“HPC”) technology, used that technology to apply for several patents, failed to disclose Cray’s technology to the Patent Office as…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Boschetto v. HansingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Appotronics Corporation Limited v. Delta Electronics, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020
- Baker v. ChinDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
- C-Innovation, LLC v. Trendsetter Engineering, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
- James Gao v. Pentium Atlas Fund III, LP, et al.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
- Serenium, Inc. v. ZhouDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020