Legal Opinion

Centanni v. Cochran

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 18, 1961Published

1Per curiam

Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this court charging that his detention by the respondent was illegal for the reason that the sentences which he is serving were imposed while he was an unmarried minor, and his parents were not given notification of the proceedings against him as required by Section 932.38 F.S.A. On the basis of petitioner’s allegations the writ was issued and a return has since been filed. It appears from the return that petitioner is not entitled to the relief which he seeks for the reason that actual notice of the charges against him was received…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bowen v. CochranSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  2. Hollingshead v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API