Tiedemann v. Tiedemann
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPette, J.
Plaintiffs move (1) for a temporary injunction restraining the defendant Tiedemann (hereinafter called the defendant) from withdrawing certain funds from the defendant bank and restraining the bank from permitting such withdrawals and (2) for an order vacating items 3 and 8 of the defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars.
The defendant moves (1) for an order of preclusion and (2) for an order dismissing the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The motion testing the sufficiency of the complaint will be disposed of first.
Assuming, as we must, on a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re RileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- In re the Proceedings to Compel Delivery of Personal Property, Alleged to Be Held by the Estate of HickmottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Estate of KummerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959