Legal Opinion

Plowman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 23, 1993No. 92-01474PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, convicted of three counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of section 790.23, Florida Statutes (1987), for three separate weapons discovered at the same time in his home pursuant to a valid search warrant, argues that the three separate convictions constitute a double jeopardy violation. We agree that it was improper to find appellant guilty on all three counts. State v. Watts, 462 So.2d 813 (Fla.1985); Grappin v. State, 450 So.2d 480 (Fla.1984). We reverse appellant’s convictions for possession of the two stun guns. Inasmuch as the sentences imposed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grappin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. State v. WattsSupreme Court of Florida · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. Charles Kevin Simpson v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  3. Francis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  5. Owens v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API