Legal Opinion

Crawford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 24, 1986No. 83-1322PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal has been reconsidered on remand from the supreme court. See Crawford v. State, 491 So.2d 1142 (Fla.1986).

We conclude that the error, discussed more fully by this court in Crawford v. State, 473 So.2d 700 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), is harmless error. In determining that the error was harmless, we have applied the rigorous analysis required by State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986), and find the state has met its burden in proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not affect the verdict.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Crawford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Crawford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AsbridgeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Holmes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Lucier v. N.D. Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996