Legal Opinion
Doscher v. Menifee Circuit Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 24, 2003No. 03-5229PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Craig Doscher, a Kentucky resident proceeding pro se, appeals the district court order dismissing his complaint construed as filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
In a fee-paid complaint, Doscher sued the Menifee County, Kentucky Circuit Court, Menifee County, and the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Doscher alleged that, in a foreclosure proceeding, the state court: (1) violated his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Tucker v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Whittiker v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
- Blake v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Aarti Hospitality, LLC v. City of Grove City, OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- Smith v. Encore Credit Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.