Legal Opinion

Marshall v. American Federation of Government Employees

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided January 9, 1998No. Civ. 96-609-RPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAVID L. RUSSELL, Chief Judge.

Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs Amended Complaint. 1 To support their motion, Defendants assert that they did not violate Plaintiffs rights to free speech under the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (“LMRDA”), 29 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. because the LMRDA’s guarantee to union members of a special right to free, speech is subject to a labor organization’s right to adopt and enforce reasonable rules as to members’ responsibilities to the organization and as to conduct which members must refrain from that would…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Smith v. MaschnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. Jewel BURRUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED TELEPHONE COMPANY OF KANSAS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  5. Finnegan v. LeuSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hussein v. Hotel Employees & Restaurant Union, Local 6District Court, S.D. New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API