United States v. Corrado
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
HIGGINS, District Judge.
The Court has before it the defendant’s motion to suppress (filed July 17, 1992; Docket Entry No. 15), supplement to motion to suppress (filed August 7, 1992; Docket Entry No. 21) and several memoranda in support and in opposition thereto. 1 For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants the defendant’s motion to suppress and the defendant’s supplement to the motion to suppress. Therefore, all evidence seized as a result of the delayed execution of the search warrant and as a result of Mr. Corrado’s arrest shall be suppressed.
I. FACTS 2
Mr. J.A. Irwin owns…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Dockery ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Ayeni Ex Rel. Ayeni v. CBS Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1994