Legal Opinion

United States v. Corrado

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided August 27, 1992No. 1:92-00006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

HIGGINS, District Judge.

The Court has before it the defendant’s motion to suppress (filed July 17, 1992; Docket Entry No. 15), supplement to motion to suppress (filed August 7, 1992; Docket Entry No. 21) and several memoranda in support and in opposition thereto. 1 For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants the defendant’s motion to suppress and the defendant’s supplement to the motion to suppress. Therefore, all evidence seized as a result of the delayed execution of the search warrant and as a result of Mr. Corrado’s arrest shall be suppressed.

I. FACTS 2

Mr. J.A. Irwin owns…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Dockery ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. Ayeni Ex Rel. Ayeni v. CBS Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API