Legal Opinion

State v. Lord

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 12, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Justice.

David Lord was convicted of terrorizing, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 210 (1983), after a jury trial in the Superior Court (Sagadahoc County, Perkins, J.). Lord appeals from that judgment, claiming that the court erred by not instructing the jury on justification and that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. We conclude that the evidence was sufficient, but that the trial court committed reversible error by failing to instruct the jury on justification. Accordingly, we vacate the judgment.

I

Lord had an ongoing dispute with his neighbor over the property line between their…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. State v. RaubesonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CannellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  2. State v. PrestonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  3. State v. GlassmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API