Legal Opinion

City of Aiken v. David Michael Koontz

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 20, 2006No. 4094PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, J.:

David Michael Koontz was tried in absentia and without counsel. He was convicted of driving under suspension (DUS), third offense. The trial judge sentenced him to six months and a $2,100 fine. On appeal, Koontz argues the trial judge erred in proceeding with his trial in absentia. We affirm. 1

FACTUALIPROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On May 8, 2004, Koontz drove his children to the public safety headquarters to deliver them to his wife, from whom he was separated. As Koontz drove up, his wife informed Aiken Department of Public Safety Officer Edgar Gonzalez that Koontz should not be driving…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. LandisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. State v. CutterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  5. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Cayce v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. State v. FaireyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  3. Williams v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  4. State v. WrappCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API