Legal Opinion
Phillipos v. Mihran
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 19, 1905No. 5269PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered December 16, 1903, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for conversion.
1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.
This is an action brought by the respondent to recover for the value of four Turkish rugs, valued at $260, which he alleges .the appellant had taken and *403carried away without his consent. The answer was a general denial, and verdict was rendered in favor of plaintiff for $260, with interest. Judgment was entered therefor. From this judgment the defendant appeals.
The amended complaint is as follows, omitting the formal parts:
“Comes now the above named plaintiff and, for cause of action against the above named defendant, states and alleges as follows: That on or about the 10th day of May, 1901,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hutchings v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Kerner v. BoardmanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891
3Cited by5 opinions
- Muscatel v. StoreyWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Fidalgo Island Shingle Co. v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Walker v. Cascade Milk Products Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1944
- Producers Refiners Corporation v. De HartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Walling v. S. Birch & Sons Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1950