Legal Opinion

People v. Gillespie

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 23, 1974No. Docket 17861PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction of what has come to be known generally as DUIL. MCLA 257.625; MSA 9.2325.

The case presents a clear-cut legal issue.

The question is: May a trial judge affirmatively charge that upon uncontradicted proof of the essential elements of the offense charged or the essential elements of one or more of the lesser included offenses under the principal offense that the jury must return a verdict of guilty of the principal charge or one of the lesser included offenses?

In this case the trial judge charged the jury:

"Now neither the prosecution nor the defendant has offered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. GibbsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. People v. LathersMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RaglandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  2. People v. CargileMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. State v. RaglandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. State v. RaglandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API