Legal Opinion

Leitham v. Cusick

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1875PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the First District Court. The facts appear in the Opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDoremak, J.

The Appellants, without any notice to the 'Respondents, applied to and obtained from the Judge at Chambers, a temporary injunction, restraining the Respondents from working or taking out ores from a certain mining property called the Undine Lode, and from removing or selling the ore.

After service of the writ, the Respondents applied to the judge at Chambers, without notice to the Appellants, and obtained an order revoking the former order, and requiring the United States Marshal to restore to the Respondents the possession of the Alexander Lode from which they had been ejected under the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Melrose v. LowUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Hale v. Point Pleasant & Ohio River R. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API