United States v. Nancy Bucaro, Larry Lawrence, George Jose Turner, Andre Rashid Kirby and Monica Johnson. Appeal of Andre Kirby
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, we must decide whether a criminal defendant’s prior adjudications of juvenile delinquency under Pennsylvania law can be taken into account under the federal sentencing guidelines. The guidelines expressly allow consideration of prior adjudications of juvenile delinquency. Appellant Andre Rashid Kirby (Kirby) contends that the guideline directing their consideration is a violation of the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws and, on this record, also a violation of his due process rights. We reject Kirby’s arguments…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Gryger v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- McDonald v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Commonwealth v. KrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- United States v. LangfordCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Richard Bruce CoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Joseph Edmund Beaulieau, A/K/A Ed Beaulieau and Thomas TownsendCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Mark Allen VarelaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Robert Harry ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.