Legal Opinion
Eirhart v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 29, 1991No. 76 C 3182, 78 C 2042PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
This Court’s May 22, 1991 memorandum opinion and order as supplemented June 7 (collectively “Opinion 1”), coupled with its June 12 “Opinion 2,” found that plaintiffs were entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees for part (though not all) of the matters covered in their November 7, 1990 petition for fees (the “Fee Petition”). Both plaintiffs and Libbey-Owens-Ford Company (“LOF”) have submitted memoranda on the remaining questions relevant to quantifying the fee award.
In a number of areas the parties have no quarrel: the basic hourly rates to be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gorenstein Enterprises, Inc., Sam Gorenstein, and David Gorenstein v. Quality Care-Usa, Inc. And David A. ScheinmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Susan Shott v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Sherry Eirhart and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Company and Lof Glass IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Shott, Susan v. Rush-Presbyterian-StCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Spencer v. VagniniDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023