Legal Opinion
Matter of Loigman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 10, 2017PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice in this state in 1990. He was previously admitted in New Jersey in 1977, where he presently maintains an office for the practice of law.
By March 9, 2016 order, respondent was issued a public reprimand by the Supreme Court of New Jersey based upon its findings that respondent commenced frivolous litigation and engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice with respect to his representation of a client (Matter of Loigman, 224 NJ 271, 131 A3d 957 [2016]). Respondent thereafter failed to notify this Court and the Attorney Grievance Committee…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of TorchiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of LaserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matter of WinogradAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Matter of PetigaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Matter of MatemuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Matter of HartwichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of KaufmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.