Legal Opinion

In Re Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics Opinion 705

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 19, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

926 A.2d 839 (2007)

192 N.J. 46

In re ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS OPINION 705.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued April 5, 2007.

Decided July 19, 2007.

Jo Astrid Glading, Acting Public Advocate, argued the cause for appellant, Department of the Public Advocate.

R. Brian McLaughlin, argued the cause for respondent, Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics (Elaine D. Dietrich, Trenton, Counsel to the Administrative Director of the Courts, attorney).

John M. Van Dalen, argued the cause for respondent, pro se.

2Per curiam

In this appeal, we must determine whether a provision of the New Jersey…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of InvestigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Winberry v. SalisburySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  3. David v. Vesta Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. Knight v. City of MargateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. McKeown-Brand v. Trump Castle Hotel & CasinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API