Legal Opinion

Man v. Man

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 6, 1921PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Robert I. Man and others, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Nassau on the 15th day of January, 1921, on the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Nassau Special Term.

1Opinion of the Court

*548Interlocutory judgment affirmed on opinion of Mr. Justice Squiers at Special Term, with costs of the appeal to those appearing and filing briefs, payable out of the estate.

Blackmar, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Jaycox, JJ., concur.

The following is the opinion delivered at Special Term:

Squiers, J.:

The plaintiff brings this action to construe the 3d clause of the will of Mary E. Man, which reads as,follows:

“ As to all the rest, residue and remainder of my property, real and personal, I direct my executors to divide the same into as many shares as will make one for each son of my late husband,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of TuckNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  2. In re the Estate of HortonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  3. In re the Accounting of PollakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  4. In re the Estate of LageNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API