Cuttino v. Lenoir
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentNess, Justice
(dissenting) :
I dissent. While I do not sanction the granting of ex parte orders, I believe the trial judge satisfied the minimum requirements of due process when he granted Mrs. Lenoir a hearing prior to issuing a final order.
Respondent Cuttino commenced this action seeking relief from the unusual behavior of appellant Lenoir. Mrs. Lenoir *450posessed certain documents and pathology reports concerning Mr. Cuttino’s deceased daughter and persisted in exhibiting these materials to the public.
By ex parte order issued August 8, 1977, Mrs. Lenoir was directed to deliver to proper authorities…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. PorterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
- Ex Parte JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Powell v. Immanuel Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- Lyles v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
- Webster v. ClantonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.