Legal Opinion
Putney v. Rosin
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided October 30, 2001No. C.A. No. 98C-10-181 JTVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAUGHN, Resident Judge.
The plaintiffs have filed a motion for a new trial after a jury returned a verdict in their favor, but only in the amount of $1200. Plaintiff Thomas W. Putney’s1 claim was one for personal injuries caused by an alleged assault committed upon him by the defendant. His wife, Mary Putney, asserted a claim for loss of consortium. The defendant, Henry W. Rosin, denied that he had assaulted Mr. Putney and disputed the nature and extent of the injuries claimed by Mr. Putney. As grounds for a new trial, the plaintiffs contend that the verdict is against the weight of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
- DeAngelis v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Chrysler Corporation v. QuimbySupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
3Cited by4 opinions
- Envolve Pharmacy Solutions, Inc. v. Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 2023
- Hammer v. Howard Medical, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2017
- PATRICIA A. MCLEOD v. PATRICK SWIER, M.D.Superior Court of Delaware · 2016
- Robinson v. BecklesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020