Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 2000No. 23252PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROW, Presiding Judge.

George Brown, Jr. (“Movant”) appeals from a judgment dismissing his pro se motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.0S5.1 The motion court dismissed Movant’s motion because it was filed more than ninety days after Movant was delivered to the Department of Corrections.

Movant’s sole point relied on is:

“The motion court clearly erred in dismissing Mr. Brown’s Rule 24.035 motion as untimely filed because the absolute deadline imposed by Rule 24.035(b) arbitrarily denied Mr. Brown due process of law. See U.S. Const., Amends. V and XIV; Mo. Const., Art. I, § 10. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jason Aaron Ivy v. Paul CaspariCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. Brown v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Driskill v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Valdez v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Brown v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Brown v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API