Legal Opinion
Ardoin v. Rougeau
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 1996No. 95-774PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[iPETERS, Judge.
This appeal arises out of a suit for writ of mandamus by J. Winston Ardoin seeking recognition as the city attorney for the City of Eunice until a replacement is approved according to law.1 Named as defendant is Hubert “Kutch” Rougeau, the mayor of Eunice. The trial court rendered judgment ordering Mayor Rougeau to recognize Mr. Ar-doin as the current city attorney for Eunice until a successor is properly appointed by the mayor with the concurrence or approval of the board of aldermen. Mayor Rougeau has appealed the trial court’s ruling.
DISCUSSION OF RECORD
The City of Eunice…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Louisiana Associated Gen. Contr. v. CalcasieuSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Green v. Louisiana Underwriters Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Cloud v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- State v. HaltomLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- Williams v. Board of Trustees for the Employees' Retirement System of the Parish of East Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.