Legal Opinion

Matter of Yeople v. . John B. Rose Company

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1918PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 14, 1918, affirming an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Cornelius Yeople, while in the employ of defendant Rose Company, received injuries resulting in his death. An award was made to his wife and to a granddaughter. The appeal is from that part of the award that allows compensation to the granddaughter.

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 14, 1918, affirming an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Cornelius Yeople, while in the employ of defendant Rose Company, received injuries resulting in his death. An award was made to his wife and to a granddaughter. The appeal is from that part of the award that allows compensation to the granddaughter. The industrial commission found that “ Jennie M. Yeople, granddaughter, is the daughter of William Yeople, son of Cornelius…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claim of Bogold v. Bogold Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  2. Claim of Shanley v. Slattery Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API