Legal Opinion

Jones v. Fruin

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to the district court for Red Willow county. Tried below before Gaslin, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error, to recover for a malicious attachment of property. The answer is a general denial. On the trial of the cause a jury was waived. The cause “was submitted to the court upon the petition, answer, and evidence,” upon consideration whereof the court found the issues in favor of the defendant in error, and rendered judgment in his favor for the sum of $75; and a motion for a new trial having been overruled, judgment was entered on the finding.

An elaborate brief has been prepared and filed by the attorney for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atchison & Nebraska Railroad v. WashburnNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Parmer v. KeithNebraska Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Connelly v. WhiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Storz v. FinklesteinNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Manning v. MaytubbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Bregman v. KressAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Storz v. FinklesteinNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API