Legal Opinion

Kerpelman v. Barrash

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 2, 1976No. 105Published

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

In March 1972, the appellant (plaintiff below), Leonard J. Kerpelman, Esquire, an attorney at law, represented Lily F. Barrash in a suit for separate maintenance that she brought *19against her husband, Frank M. Barrash, the appellee (defendant below) in the instant proceedings. In the suit she also asked for an allowance of counsel fees. The husband countered with a cross-bill in which he sought a divorce a mensa et thoro grounded upon allegations that the wife “did on or about February 29, 1972, and without any just cause or reason, abandon and desert . ..” him. On June 22, 1972, the case came…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hood v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  2. Myers v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Fletcher v. FlournoyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  4. Daiger v. DaigerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  5. McCurley v. StockbridgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API