Legal Opinion
Doe v. Jindal
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided February 16, 2012No. Civil Action No. 11-554-BAJ-SCRPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION1
BRIAN A. JACKSON, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, John Doe and James Doe, filed suit against Defendants, James D. Caldwell, Jr., James M. LeBlanc, Hillar C. Moore, III, and John Phillip Haney, asserting that Louisiana Revised Statute 14:91.5 (“the Act”) is unconstitutional, and they seek declaratory and injunctive relief against its enforcement. A bench trial was held on November 2, 2011.2 The parties have filed pre-trial briefs (docs. 37 and 38), and post-trial briefs (docs. 48 and 49). Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
BACKGROUND
On June -14, 2011, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. PackinghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
- Doe v. NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2012
- State v. PackinghamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Does v. CooperDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015
- State of Louisiana v. Ryan K. ManascoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.