Legal Opinion

Hargrove v. Cantrell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 16, 1989No. 87-920, 87-981PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Justice.

Defendants appeal a judgment based on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, awarding damages, costs, and attorney fees under the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1981 et seq. We affirm.

The issues are whether the verdict of the jury and the award of damages were supported by the evidence; whether the trial court properly awarded costs and attorney fees pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1989(a)(2); and whether any alleged error as to inconsistent verdicts was waived by defendants’ failure to object at trial.

On September 13, 1984, plaintiff, Linda Cantrell,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jenny Nieto, A/K/A Jenny Nieto Soto v. Bill Pence, Individually and D/B/A Import Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Conley v. BeaverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. SIMMONS AUTO SALES v. Royal Motor Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. DISPOS. SOLUTIONS-LANDFILL v. Town of LowndesboroCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  2. Redman v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Chrysler Corporation v. SchifferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Miller v. Pettibone Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  5. Chrysler Corporation v. SchifferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API