Legal Opinion

People v. Flores

California Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1968No. Crim. No. 11946PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

68 Cal.2d 563 (1968)

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

FERNANDO M. FLORES, Defendant and Appellant.

Crim. No. 11946.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

May 9, 1968.

Fernando M. Flores, in pro. per., and Ronald S. Tucker, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Roger E. Venturi, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

TOBRINER, J.

An information charged Fernando Flores and Anita Falcon with violation of Health and Safety Code section 11500.5 (possession of narcotics…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. FloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. De SantiagoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. GallegosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API