Legal Opinion

State Compensation Fund v. Stanke

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 25, 1974No. 1 CA-IC 936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Presiding Judge.

On this review by certiorari of an award entered by the respondent Commission, a question is presented as to the maximum amount which may be awarded to a surviving widow as a death benefit for the burial expenses of her deceased husband.

At the time the husband suffered his industrial injury in 1958, A.R.S. § 23-1046, subsections A(l) and D, read as follows:

“A. In case of an injury causing death, the compensation therefor shall be known as a death benefit, and shall be payable in the amount, for the period, and to and for the benefit of the persons following:
“1.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Magma Copper Co. v. NaglichArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Ranger Insurance Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. Coover v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  4. Tipton v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  2. Triste v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  3. Ezell v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  4. Kisco, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. Putvain v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API