In Re Estate of Dombrowski
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County admitting a will to probate, and from an order-refusing a new trial. N. D. Arnot, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Isidore B. Dopkweiler, Walter R. Leeds, and Robert B. Murphey, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
Two papers, claimed to be, respectively, the will and the codicil thereto of Fannie Dombrowski, deceased, were filed in the superior court of Los Angeles County by E. B. Studer, who petitioned for letters of administration with the will annexed. Subsequently a petition for probate and'for letters testamentary was filed by Robert H. Lovett and Joseph W. Maple, two of the persons named as executors. Walter, Elsa, and Flora Dombrowski, the children and sole heirs of the decedent, filed a contest, opposing probate on the ground that the papers had not been executed as required by the statutes…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Estate of LatourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Waller v. WallerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1845
- Estate of ToomesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Plate's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Langan v. LanganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Schlyen v. SchlyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- In Re the Estate of ManchesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Randall v. PhilbrookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Michels v. Pacific Tile & Porcelain Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Bank of California National Ass'n v. BanducciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.