Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hyde v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 1988No. 28A01-8802-CR-56Published

1DissentSullivan, Judge

Deborah Dennis, a Humane Society employee, over objection as to relevance, testified as follows:

“Q. Has Jack Hyde told you that he has a weapon?

A. Yes.

Q. Have you seen that weapon?

A. Yes.

Q. What kind of a weapon does he have?

A. It’s a sawed-off shotgun.

Q. Do you know the purpose for which Jack Hyde obtained that weapon?

KAREN R. STRUEH: Objection. It calls for conjecture and speculation.

THE COURT: Sustained.

Q. Did Jack Hyde tell you why he acquired that weapon?

A. Yes, he did.

Q. And what was it ... what was the purpose that he told you?

A. He told me that he had bought it and he was going to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. David L. HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. Leroy MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Hall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. BaishDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State v. Mustafa Abdulla Abu-IsbaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API