Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bair v. Bair

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1966No. 9581Published

1ConcurrenceTaylor, Justice

(concurring):.As a general proposition, a collateral attack upon a judgment can be permitted only in cases where the judgment is invalid on jurisdictional grounds or where it was obtained through extrinsic fraud. Moycs v. Moyes, 60 Idaho 601, 94 P.2d 782 (1939) ; Rogers v. National Surety Co., 53 Idaho 128, 22 P.2d 141 (1933); Welch v. Morris, 49 Idaho 781, 291 P. 1048 (1930) ; Harkness v. Utah Power & Light Co., 49 Idaho 756, 291 P. 1051 (1930) ; Weil v. Defenbach, 36 Idaho 37, 208 P. 1025 (1922) ; O’Neill v. Potvin, 13 Idaho 721, 93 P. 20, 257 (1907).

I do not regard the decision in Treece…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Robinson v. RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Old Colony Trust Co. v. PorterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  3. O'Neill v. PotvinIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Stewart v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Moyes v. MoyesIdaho Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API