Legal Opinion

In re Minute Maid Pomegranate Blueberry Flavored Juice Blend Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided February 5, 2015No. MDL No. 2593Published

1Opinion of the Court

*1366ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

SARAH S. VANCE, Chair.

Before the Panel: * Defendants The Minute Maid Company and The Coca-Cola Company (collectively, Coca-Cola) move under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize pretrial proceedings in this litigation in the Central District of California. This litigation consists of two actions pending in the Central District of California and the Northern District of Florida, as listed on Schedule A. Plaintiffs in both actions oppose centralization.

On the basis of the papers filed and the hearing session held, we conclude that centralization will not serve the convenience of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Eli Lilly & Co.(cephalexin Monohydrate)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
  2. In Re Transocean Ltd. Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
  3. In re Kashi Co. Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API