Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Di Maria & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1963PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDomenick L. Gabrielli, J.

This is an application for an order to stay arbitration in which the respondent claims that (1) the petitioner’s demand for arbitration was not in proper form and (2) that the petitioner had prosecuted his claim to judgment and is, therefore, barred from relief under the New York Automobile Accident Indemnification Endorsement.

It appears that on August 30,1960, the petitioner was involved in a collision with a car owned and operated by one Isaac Washington. The petitioner brought suit in Supreme Court for the injuries suffered and damages he sustained. Washington’s insurance carrier…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Van Arsdale v. . KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Concourse Super Service Station, Inc. v. PriceNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Marsh v. JohnstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  4. Klepper v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coclin Tobacco Co., Inc., Creditor v. Robert J. Griswold, Trustee, in the Matter of Louis G. Greenfield, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API