Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Geico Casualty Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided September 24, 2015No. Civil Action No. 06-408-RGAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ANDREWS, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE:

Presently before the Court are Defendants’ Motion to Decertify the Classes (D.I. 700), related briefing (D.I. 701, 704, 708, 715, 717), Plaintiffs’ Motion for Wilmington Pain & Rehabilitation Center and Rehabilitation Associates, P.A. to Intervene and Substitute as Class Representatives (D.I. 726), and related briefing (D.I. 727, 729, 730, 737). The Court heard oral argument on the motion to decertify on May 27, 2015. (D.I. 724).

For the reasons discussed herein, Plaintiffs’ motion to substitute new class representatives is DENIED. Defendants’…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  4. Dunlap v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  5. William Barnes v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2017
  2. Carroll v. Phillip Morris USA, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2017
  3. Green v. GEICOSuperior Court of Delaware · 2018
  4. Green v. GEICO General Insurance CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2017
  5. Green v. GeicoSuperior Court of Delaware · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API