Legal Opinion
Noe v. Ambach
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 30, 1982No. 80 Civ. 5212 (WCC)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CONNER, District Judge:
Plaintiffs Mary Noe and her son, John Noe, commenced this action against various New York State and New York City officials under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (“EAHCA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1401, et seq., the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“RA”), 29 U.S.C. § 701, et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs sought certain educational services and related psychological services for John Noe, who has certain psychological disabilities. Following a denial of plaintiffs’ motion for certification of a class under Rule 23, F.R.Civ.P., the action was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Summit Valley Industries, Inc. v. Local 112, United Brotherhood of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thomas F. Smith, Jr. v. Cumberland School CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Hurry Ex Rel. Hurry v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1983
- Miener v. Special School Dist. of St. Louis CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1984
- Byrnes v. RilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Rollison v. BiggsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.