Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Meeker

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 27, 1925Published

1Opinion of the Court

McKee, J.:

This is an action of interpleader. The plaintiff brought suit to recover brokers’ commissions for services alleged to have been rendered the Forty-second Street and Madison Avenue Corporation in leasing its building at No. 17 East Forty-first street to Maude^E. Ames. The defendant Meeker filed a claim for the same commissions and upon motion the money was paid into court and Meeker substituted for the corporation as defendant. The testimony shows conclusively, I think, that Mrs. Ames employed the plaintiff to negotiate the lease and that he performed at least part of the work of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Lloyd v. . MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Miller v. ViningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  4. McEvoy v. Athens Hotel Co.New York Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API