Legal Opinion

United States v. Flowers

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 22, 2003No. 02-5149PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal involving the denial of a suppression motion. After defendant/appellant Willie Earl Flowers’ suppression motion was denied, Flowers entered a conditional plea of guilty to a charge of possession of a firearm after a former felony conviction. A sentencing issue is raised as to whether the district court correctly concluded that he was in the category of armed career criminals, subject to a mandatory minimum sentence of fifteen years.

I

BACKGROUND

The information that led to Flowers’ arrest came from a person questioned by Officers White and Bella of the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Columbia Lea Regional HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. NajarCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. ReevesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. Marshall v. Columbia Lea Regional HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. James v. ChavezDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API