Legal Opinion

Novak v. Nowak

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1940No. 27,305PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFansler, J.

The appellee brought this action to have a conveyance of real estate declared fraudulent and void and to procure a reconveyance of the property. There was a judgment for the plaintiff. The appellants assign error upon the overruling of a motion for a new trial and a motion to modify the judgment. The questions presented involve only the sufficiency of the evidence.

There is no substantial conflict in the evidence. The appellee was born in Poland. He is a naturalized citizen, past seventy years of age. He can read and write in Polish, but does not read or write English, and has difficulty in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. BoatrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Gilchrist v. HatchIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Rogers v. SamplesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fager v. HundtIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Trees v. KerseyIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Lane v. GugsellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Bellin v. BloomIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Ratcliff v. RatcliffIndiana Supreme Court · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API