Legal Opinion

Pedro v. Huggins

Superior Court of The Virgin Islands

Decided March 5, 2010No. Civil No. SX-98-CV-792PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, Judge

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

(March 5, 2010)

THIS MATTER came on for hearing on March 20,2009. Plaintiff was present and represented by Trudy Fenster, Esq., of the Law Offices of Rohn & Cameron, LLC. Defendant did not appear by counsel or in person at the hearing. Based upon the failure of the Defendant to appear for the hearing, the Court directed that default be entered against the Defendant *101pursuant to SUPER. CT. R. 471 and proceeded to hold a hearing on the request for judgment by default made pursuant to SUPER. Ct. R. 48(b). After hearing the testimony, the Court found that Defendant is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Isbrandtsen Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Jamison v. EncarnacionSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Mountain View Coach Lines, Inc. v. StormsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alleyne v. Diageo USVI, Inc.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
  2. Ryan v. RyanSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2010
  3. Leonor Mercedes Palermo v. World Fresh Market, L.L.C. a/k/a PuebloSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API