Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. Spokane County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 22, 1992No. 11603-4-IIIPublished

1DissentMunson, J.

(dissenting) — The effect of the majority opinion is that a county can never recover omitted taxes when encumbered new construction is omitted from the tax rolls by the County Assessor. I do not believe that was the intent of the Legislature.

A pertinent proviso in RCW 84.40.080, regarding omitted property, states: "That no such assessment shall be made in any case where a bona fide purchaser, encumbrancer, or contract buyer has acquired any interest in said property prior to the time such improvements are assessed." RCW 84.40.085 limits the assessment on omitted property to the 3 previous…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tomlinson v. ClarkeWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Grand Investment Co. v. SavageCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  3. Nickelson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  4. Tomlinson v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API