Legal Opinion

Briggs v. Cass Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1913No. Docket No. 46PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Certiorari to Cass; Des Voignes, J. Contempt proceedings against Marion W. Briggs and others for disobedience of an injunction in a suit brought by William L. Jones against the Michigan railroad commission. The Cass County Home Telephone Company was allowed to intervene as a party defendant. Marion W. Briggs and Charles E. Sweet bring certiorari from an order adjudging them guilty of contempt.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is a proceeding in certiorari to review the proceedings of the circuit judge, wherein he found relators and appellants guilty of contempt of court.

The Cass County Home Telephone Company is a corporation doing business in Cass and Van Burén counties, with a telephone exchange at the village of Cassopolis. William L. Jones was one of the subscribers, a patron of the company, and had a telephone. About January 30, 1912, his telephone was disconnected and service discontinued. In March, 1912, he made complaint to the Michigan railroad commission, charging the company with discrimina*30tion in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maslen v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Michigan Central Railroad v. Michigan Railroad CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. People ex rel. Brewer v. KiddMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Fletcher Paper Co. v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. City of Detroit v. Michigan Railroad CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. City of Traverse City v. Michigan Railroad CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Chamberlain v. DurfeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Noble v. Detroit Taxicab & Transfer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API