Legal Opinion
Nava v. City of Santa Fe
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided October 13, 2004No. 28,220PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Justice.
{1} Defendant City of Santa Fe appeals directly to this Court from an adverse judgment in favor of Plaintiff Deanna Nava on her New Mexico Human Rights Act (NMHRA) claim. At trial, Plaintiff alleged her immediate supervisor discriminated against her because of her sex, and Defendant, as her employer, knew of this discrimination and failed to take remedial action. On appeal, Defendant claims that the district court erred in its instructions to the jury and that there was not substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict. Plaintiff cross-appeals claiming that the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Sheldon L. Wulf v. The City of Wichita, Gene Denton, and Richard LamunyonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Sandoval v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- Sanders v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re New Mexico Indirect Purchasers Microsoft Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- Bird v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Ulibarri v. State of New Mexico Corrections AcademyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.