Legal Opinion

Harris v. Daniels

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 5, 2006No. CIV. 06-1562-HAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HAGGERTY, Chief Judge.

Petitioner brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He invokes this court’s jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343(4). Petitioner is a federal prisoner being housed by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) at the Federal Correctional Institution in Sheridan, Oregon. Petitioner asserts that his statutory and due process rights are being violated by the BOP’s revocation of his eligibility for reduction of his period of custody.

Petitioner was convicted in the Northern District of California in September, 2001, for Unlawful…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Paul N. Bowen v. Robert A. Hood, 1 Warden, Fci, SheridanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Charles FURGUIEL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael L. BENOV, Warden, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API