Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Thompkins

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 23, 1998No. 75,258Published

1DissentSix, J.

Solly Thompkins asserts that the district court had no jurisdiction to instruct on first-degree premeditated murder. He also reasons that felony murder and premeditated murder *626are no longer the same offense. The majority locates a due process issue and reverses. I disagree with both Thompkins and the majority. Thompkins neither raises a due process argument regarding the premeditated murder instruction nor establishes that he was prejudiced in advancing his defense. He was not surprised by the instruction.

I would affirm Thompkins’ conviction for premeditated murder. Count I of the information…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. State v. StarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  3. State v. ClovisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API