State v. Thompkins
Supreme Court of Kansas
1DissentSix, J.
Solly Thompkins asserts that the district court had no jurisdiction to instruct on first-degree premeditated murder. He also reasons that felony murder and premeditated murder *626are no longer the same offense. The majority locates a due process issue and reverses. I disagree with both Thompkins and the majority. Thompkins neither raises a due process argument regarding the premeditated murder instruction nor establishes that he was prejudiced in advancing his defense. He was not surprised by the instruction.
I would affirm Thompkins’ conviction for premeditated murder. Count I of the information…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- State v. StarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- State v. ClovisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993