Legal Opinion

Hill v. Nichols

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 16, 1927No. 2555PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREWSTER, District Judge.

This is an action brought by plaintiff, as sole, surviving executor of the will of Peter C. Brooks, to recover from the defendant, as collector of internal revenue, an additional estate tax paid by plaintiff under protest The amount of- the tax and interest paid was $1,186,617.27. There was a trial without jury upon agreed facts.

Peter C. Brooks died January 27, 1920, léaving an estate subject to the estate tax imposed by the Revenue Act of 1918 (40 Stat. 1097). Some 15 years before his death the testator had transferred to trustees certain securities and cash, to be…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. New York Trust Co. v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Young Men's Christian Assn. of Columbus v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Schlesinger v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Maxwell v. BugbeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  2. Newhall v. CaseyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1927
  3. Stark v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API