Legal Opinion

People v. 'Abdul-Malik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Whether defendant was so intoxicated as to be unable to form the requisite intent to commit murder in the second degree presented an issue of fact (see, People v Danaher, 115 AD2d 905, 906; People v Shapiro, 96 AD2d 626, 627). The jury’s resolution of this issue in the *1024People’s favor was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence.

We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to conduct a hearing pursuant to CPL 730.30 (1) upon ascertaining through the presentence report that defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. People v. ArnoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. People v. DanaherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. People v. ShapiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. People v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. RamirezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API