Legal Opinion
Willinsky v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 9, 1976No. 75-942PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
The appellant was found guilty by a jury of the sale or delivery of a controlled substance, cocaine. The point of this ap*537peal is the alleged error of the trial court in allowing the following question and answer during cross-examination:
“Q. Mr. Willinsky, you never told anybody at the preliminary hearing this story, did you?
“A. I never had a chance to testify in my preliminary hearing, but the young lady was there, in fact, Miss Danzinger.”
The error, if any exists, does not clearly appear because the record does not show an objection, motion to strike or motion for mistrial. Nevertheless, we…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Corbin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
3Cited by1 opinion
- Manning v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976