Legal Opinion
Gelt v. Janowitz (In Re Chisholm Co.)
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided April 13, 1994No. Civ. A. No. 93-K-860. Bankruptcy No. 89 B 09124 DPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON APPEAL
KANE, Senior District Judge.
Gregory L. Bamford and Howard B. Gelt appeal from the bankruptcy court’s October 29,1991 order finding that they were subject to sanctions under Bankruptcy Rule 9011 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and its April 7, 1993 order assessing sanctions against them jointly and severally in the amount of $162,987.52. Bamford, president of the Debtor, The Chisholm Company, argues: (1) he was denied due process because he did not receive notice that the court contemplated the entry of sanctions against him individually, nor was he afforded an adequate…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Courtesy Inns, Ltd., Inc., Debtor. Randolph F. Jones v. Bank of Santa FeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- In Re Kliegl Bros. Universal Elec. Stage LightingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- In Re MerrillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1995
- Naomi Isaacson v. Nauni Jo MantyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- In Re Dick Tracy Insurance Agency, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.